Chambal Fertilisers, Coromandel International, Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals (GSFC), and Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers (RCF) are major players in India’s fertilizer industry. While Chambal excels in urea production, Coromandel leads in phosphatic fertilizers. GSFC and RCF have diversified portfolios, including industrial chemicals. Each company has unique strengths in product range, geographical reach, and financial performance.
| Company | Market Cap (₹ Cr) | Revenue (₹ Cr) | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | ROE (%) | Debt-to-Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chambal Fertilisers | ~ ₹18,000 Cr | ~ ₹22,000 Cr | ~ ₹1,800 Cr | ~18% | Moderate |
| Coromandel International | ~ ₹35,000 Cr | ~ ₹24,000 Cr | ~ ₹2,000 Cr | ~20% | Low |
| GSFC | ~ ₹7,000 Cr | ~ ₹10,000 Cr | ~ ₹800 Cr | ~12% | Low |
| RCF | ~ ₹6,500 Cr | ~ ₹12,000 Cr | ~ ₹750 Cr | ~10% | High |
| Company | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| Chambal Fertilisers | Largest private-sector urea producer; strong distribution in North India. | Dependent on urea subsidies; minimal diversification. |
| Coromandel International | Strong phosphatic fertilizer and crop protection business; low debt. | Dependent on raw material imports; impacted by global commodity prices. |
| GSFC | Diversified chemicals and fertilizers portfolio; government support. | Lower profitability; limited geographical expansion. |
| RCF | Strong PSU backing; extensive industrial chemical range. | High debt; competition from private players. |
| Company | Promoter Holding | Institutional Investors | Public Holding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chambal Fertilisers | ~60% (KK Birla Group) | ~20% | ~20% |
| Coromandel International | ~57% (Murugappa Group) | ~25% | ~18% |
| GSFC | ~37% (Govt. of Gujarat) | ~35% | ~28% |
| RCF | ~75% (Govt. of India) | ~10% | ~15% |
| Company | Future Strategies |
|---|---|
| Chambal Fertilisers | Expanding urea capacity; improving energy efficiency. |
| Coromandel International | Investing in specialty fertilizers, organic growth, and backward integration in raw materials. |
| GSFC | Strengthening industrial chemicals segment; increasing specialty fertilizers. |
| RCF | Modernizing plants; diversifying into green hydrogen and bio-fertilizers. |
| Company | Primary Customers | Market Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Chambal Fertilisers | Farmers, government urea buyers | Northern & Central India |
| Coromandel International | Farmers, agri-retailers | Southern & Eastern India |
| GSFC | Farmers, industrial clients | Gujarat, Maharashtra |
| RCF | Farmers, industrial chemical buyers | Western India |
For investors or stakeholders, Coromandel appears the most resilient, while Chambal remains a urea powerhouse. GSFC & RCF are stable but less dynamic.
Vinati Organics stands tall in profitability and niche dominance, while Gujarat Fluorochemicals leads in clean-tech and fluoropolymer scale. Aarti Industries combines breadth and MNC contracts, showing margin recovery. Camlin Fine is smaller but cost-effective with potential in food antioxidants. Valuations and investor preferences diverge based on segment risk and growth themes.
HUL leads India’s FMCG space with premium branding and operational strength. Dabur shines with Ayurveda focus and rural trust. Godrej Consumer emphasizes innovation and global expansion. Jyothy Labs grows rapidly in fabric and home care. This strategic comparison reveals which FMCG stock holds the best value and growth potential in 2025.
Sumitomo Chemical India leads with strong growth and margins backed by its Japanese parent. Dhanuka Agritech offers efficient domestic exposure. Sharda Cropchem thrives in exports with an asset-light model but faces regulatory risks. Excel Industries remains a niche player with stable returns but limited scale. Each caters to distinct investor profiles.
